Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stratajet (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:49, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stratajet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The references asserted in the previous AfD are press releases, as can be seen by the internal evidence of their identical phrasing. The only other argument from the contributor was that we have an article on a competitor--using such an argument proves the intent to be advertisement. There are many places for PR , but we're an encyclopedia DGG ( talk ) 23:05, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:45, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:45, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:45, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- no encyclopedically relevant prose, and no sources that meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Copy includes:
  • "In May 2016, Stratajet announced that it had received a round of funding..."
This content belongs on the company web site, not here. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:57, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.